The
election season has flown by in live color and raw sound. My eyes still widening from my morning
NesCafe, my cab swishes by a billboard with a stern face promising jobs and a
strong Egypt. The newspaper stands
on my way to lunch are riddled with headlines of the latest developments in the
dramatic race. After the heat has
overcome the city, my afternoon cab swerves around a dozen supporters holding
their candidate’s sign. Popping by
my neighborhood fruit stand on my way home, an interview with leading
candidates blares out through rows of peaches and mangos. Egypt votes for a president on
Wednesday. Egypt is choosing its
leader in what will hopefully be its first fair presidential elections since
its independence in 1952. This is
history, and Egyptians are making it.
Candidates' faces whizz by on my morning cab ride to work |
***
“Did
you see the march?”
“What
march?”
“For
Abu Ismail!”
All
the doormen in Ayman’s building were giddy with political excitement about the
nearby crowds. It was almost
midnight on a Wednesday, and thousands of Salafists, rather fundamentalist Islamists, had taken to the streets
with “God is great” chants and fireworks in support of their favored candidate,
conservative sheikh Hazem Salah Abu Ismail. After weeks of rumors and accusations, Abu Ismail’s mother
had been found not to have American
citizenship, which would have banned him from running according to some bizarre
Egyptian law. I seized on the
moment to ask Ayman, my doorman friend, who he would give his
vote to (though my wording may sound strange, that is how it is phrased here in
Arabic). Instead of spitting out a
name, he confessed to me how scared he was of a religious candidate coming to
power and how adamantly he believed religion and politics should be entirely
separate. This shocked me, since
religion plays such a prevalent role here. He went on to explain that he felt the Muslim Brotherhood
and the Salafists had proven themselves liars, traitors to the revolution, and
since coming to power with 70% of the Parliament’s seats, nothing had
transpired other than theater and lies.
Campaign banner for disqualified Salafist candidate Abu Ismail |
As
I was leaving, Ayman told me that he would be observing an election site
somewhere in Cairo, as he has a part-time government job in a community center
in his neighborhood. He recalled
an anecdote during the parliamentary elections of 2010, which, like all
previous elections, had been rigged in favor of Mubarak’s party. He was at his assigned election site
when a soldier walked in - “He said his name was Nadar, I’ll never forget his
name.” The soldier spoke with
Ayman, who was then forced to stand by while he and a couple other
cronies stuffed the ballot box with a couple thousand ballots. “Whoever we get next will be better
than going back to that.”
***
“Abo
al-Fatouh,” Karim told me, almost cautiously, once we inevitably got onto the
subject of the presidential elections.
Mamdouh nodded alongside him, and it all clicked for me. Abdul Moneim Abo al-Fatouh appeared to be the bridge that
could connect secularists and Muslims in a country where religion is a
constant, but not without much toil and debate. For many of my young, liberal, Muslim friends, he squarely
represents their worldviews, including their support of the revolution and
their backgrounds as Muslims.
Having once been part of the Muslim Brotherhood, he started to break
with the organization as his Islamic philosophy became more and more steeped
with liberal openness. He
officially broke with them after announcing his bid for presidency in the wake
of the revolution, which the Brotherhood at the time forbade. Abo al-Fatouh seems to me someone that
can appeal to large segments of society: a friend went to one of his rallies
and described its energy as akin to Obama’s 2008 campaign.
Campagin poster for Abdul Moneim Abo alFatouh |
The
other candidate who speaks to liberal secularists is Hamdeen Sabahy, a
firecracker leftist who had been opposing Mubarak’s party in parliament for
years and joining activists in all sorts of protests. Miriam, my colleague at work told me she respects him, but
she is uncomfortable with his socialist background.
***
“Seriously,
Amr Moussa?!” I shrieked at my friend Amir in shock. Only a month or two before, we had watched a talk show
interview with the former Mubarak statesman in which the man spent the whole
interview regaling the audience with his heroic anti-Israeli antics during his
tenure as Mubarak’s foreign minister, during which he broke with regime policy
on the loathed Israel. The former
minister has been campaigning strongly with lots of funds, and friends have
told me they fear his exploiting the popularity of his name and reputation and
using his financial prowess to convince entire families to vote for him. Uneducated people in the countryside
don’t need much convincing to vote for someone; since little interest is shown
in their villages, if a candidate makes a visit, he is more or less guaranteed
a vote. This is so indicative of
the lack of political education here, in that a decision is not made based on
who presents the best campaign and solutions, but rather, on where and at who
money is thrown.
Some
people see Moussa as being of the "faloul":
this word refers to the remnants of the former regime, and is generally not
said as a compliment. A few weeks
ago, there was a Friday protest against the faloul, who at the time also included Omar Suleiman, the
notorious chief of intelligence in Mubarak’s regime who was appointed vice
president after the revolution in an attempt to placate the masses; that
obviously failed, and he was in fact the one to announce Mubarak’s
resignation. The other holdover
from the Mubarak regime is Ahmed Shafiq, former aviation minister, and the last
prime minister appointed by Mubarak before the revolution.
Amr Moussa campaign poster |
Although
one might think these faloul figures
would be ostracized and hated, the two leftovers, Amr Moussa and Ahmed Shafiq,
enjoy seats at the top of the polls only 24 hours before they open. This is because Egyptians also crave
stability right now, and being practical, they see that only strong statesmen
with experience in politics can set Egypt on the right course. Christians like my colleague Miriam are
also drawn to these secular faloul candidates,
since they truly dread the possibility of an extremist Islamist government
grabbing power. The sentiment of
wanting someone who will fix what is broken makes sense. It doesn’t matter that Shafiq sounds
like a broken record of Mubarak in his speeches; he has the political prowess
to comfort people. Egyptians have
had a traumatizing year since their revolution broke out: they have lost
hundreds of youth to police batons and army tanks, the economy has tanked,
security fears have become rampant, there are shortages of gas and other goods,
and well, not much has changed, or at least not enough.
I
was also with Amir the night we heard about the “istiba’ad”, the expulsion of a number of top contenders for
the presidency by the election council.
This was such a game-changer that Amir and I both took it for a joke at
first. But it was soon confirmed
that Salafist candidate Abu Ismail had indeed been banned, as had former spy
chief Omar Suleiman, and the charismatic adviser and financier of the Muslim
Brotherhood, Khairat alShater (who I think would have won otherwise.)
***
“I’m
sick of politics. I’m just totally
tired of all the drama,” Gamal threw his hands up in the air at my inquisitive
question about whom he would vote for.
His sentiments were understandable, what with the explosive roller
coaster ride the contest has been.
Every day has been a new allegation hurled from one political stronghold
to the next, a new law drafted to ban remnants of the former regime, or en
entirely new candidate!
“So,
have you made a decision, then?” I
pressed Gamal, half sarcastically, but also truly curious about whom this
pious, intelligent, and simple man wanted to lead his nation.
“I’m
just observing it all right now, gathering information, I don’t think I’ll make
my decision until the last minute.”
I told Gamal I liked his approach; it reminded me of my first time
voting in the 2008 primaries, between Obama and Hillary. Gamal is pretty religious,
so I pried him about whether or not he would be voting for Mohammad Morsi, the
candidate the Muslim Brotherhood ended up fielding after their previous
candidate, Khairat alShatr was banned.
He told me did indeed want Islam to be a greater part of government, but
that he was not sure he trusted the Brotherhood anymore.
Billboard for Mohammad Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood candidate |
Even
with only a day left before polls open, I speak with Egyptians like Gamal and
Miriam who are still on the fence, still weighing the options, still
contemplating who it is they want to lead their beloved nation. The first round of elections will be spread
out over two days this week, Wednesday and Thursday, with a likely runoff
taking place in mid-June. Egypt’s
new president should be announced by June 21st. People generally seem optimistic that
things will be peaceful, although there are worries that after the final result
in June people could take to the streets in fury if their candidates do not
win, or if the military council goes back on its word and does not hand over
power.
Will
the elections be clean? More or
less, if you don’t count the Muslim Brotherhood handing out packs of sugar or kilos
of meat to sway voters, or the general inefficacy of Egyptian bureaucracy. Will the SCAF support a certain
candidate and refuse to respect the will of the people? Everyone hopes not. Will Egypt be able to change course
under the guidance of a democratically-elected president? That’s the idea, but ultimately, Allahu
a’aalam, only God knows, so, khair in sha Allah, hopefully, all goes well.
What a great breakdown of the candidates/issues. Loved how you personalize it as well by introducing individuals and their opinions.
ReplyDeleteYou should really write for a broader audience!
Ditto to the above comment -- as always, you take us there, walking down the streets, riding in the cab, conversations with friends and their wide range of views (reflecting your ability to connect with so many different people). The New Yorker recently had a profile of a young Salafist Nour Party politician from Alexandria -- not a presidential candidate -- one Ahmed Khalil Khairallah. It focused on issues of how Islam and Sharia could work within a democracy. The last sentence was Khairallah's assertion, "The Egyptian revolution is one of the signs of the existence of God."
ReplyDeleteHmmm ...mmmmm. Great to hear from you -- we'll be waiting to hear who should rule Egypt. Laine
I love how detailed your post are. Miss you!!!! xoxo keep posting!
ReplyDeleteactually haven't finished reading it..let me read it all and then discuss ;)